“At the start of the (Bill) Clinton administration, in 1993 and 1994, I was a special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, on loan from CIA, deeply involved in an annual terrorism review which nearly resulted in Pakistan’s being placed on the formal list of state sponsors of terrorism,” Robert L Grenier, a former CIA official, said
Opinion
09/09/2016.
724.
All Members,
Respected family members of this great holy Nation.
Sub : ‘Pak was nearly placed on list of state sponsors of terror’
Ref : Media reports - Hindustan Times
1.
Pakistan was “nearly placed” on a formal US list of state sponsors of terrorism during 1993 to 1994, an ex-CIA official has said.
“At the start of the (Bill) Clinton administration, in 1993 and 1994, I was a special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, on loan from CIA, deeply involved in an annual terrorism review which nearly resulted in Pakistan’s being placed on the formal list of state sponsors of terrorism,” Robert L Grenier, a former CIA official, said yesterday.
2.
He was addressing members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during a Congressional hearing on Pakistan.
Grenier said that over the past five decades, the US has been willing, episodically to overlook its concerns with aspects of Pakistani behaviour and to subordinate those concerns in the face of what have appeared, at the time, to be overriding national security priorities – only to revert to a more contentious relationship when those interests no longer pertained.
“Thus, in the 1980’s, the US was willing not only to overlook growing evidence of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program in deference to joint US-Pak support to the anti-Soviet Afghan Mujahiddin, but also to provide Pakistan with generous economic and military rewards in the bargain,” he said.
3.
In the immediate aftermath of 9/11 attacks, needing a platform for operations in Afghanistan and a partner to intercept Al-Qaeda militants fleeing that country, the US was again willing to subordinate its broader concerns with Pakistani-based militancy in Kashmir and with Pakistan’s ambivalent attitude toward the Afghan Taliban, he said.
Pakistan has clung stubbornly to its own perceptions of national interest, and refused to compromise them even when it seemed irrational or self-defeating to US eyes, he said.
4.
He also said the same has happened in the context of nuclear weapons doctrine, in its assessment of the threat from India, or in its calculus regarding both foreign and domestic militant groups.
Pakistani adherence to its perceived interests, in fact, has persisted, irrespective of US-administered punishments or inducements, Greiner said.
However, the former CIA station chief in Islamabad, warned the lawmakers against taking any punitive action or sanctions against Pakistan. In fact he encouraged that the US should help Pakistan maintain a large conventional armed forces.
5.
“Pakistan’s conventional military forces will need to be maintained if we are to avoid quick recourse to nuclear weapons at a time when Kashmir remains a social and political tinderbox, and the threat of Indo-Pak war still hangs like an incubus across the region,” he said.
“The US dares not turn its back on Pakistan as it seeks to protect its serious national security interests in South- Central Asia,” Grenier said.
My view
1. Pakistan is exposed completely;
2. Proved beyond doubt that Pak Sponser and exports terrorists all over the world apart from bleeding Bharatham with bad intention to swallow Kashmir;
3. USA the main supporter of Pakistan, now realised it was wrong; and strongly warn Pak; and take side of Bharatham atpresent;
4. The whole world is not alert, after experiencing terror in their countries, now speak loud;
5. It is urgent before the rogue organisations and sponsering countries, take some extreme step to destroy mankind.
Thank you for reading
JAIHIND.
Next with another topic ...
Comments
Post a Comment